Monday, July 30, 2012

Jerusalem by Dr. Anthony Antolini


When the music for the memorial service for Phil von Hemert was being planned there was a hymn called “Jerusalem” that Phil had requested but it was not sung at the service because the family felt that it might not be familiar. (The hymns that were sung were all “old favorites” and sung with conviction.) Because “Jerusalem” is such a noble tune, I decided to play it as part of the postlude (following the Dutch national anthem – another of Phil’s requests.)
After the service I ran into Renny Stackpole. He lamented that “Jerusalem” had not been sung and wondered why such an old standard would be considered too unfamiliar to include. This got me wondering whether it was an “old standard.” For Renny and me, “Jerusalem” is so familiar we can sing it by heart. Yet it hasn’t ever been in an Episcopal hymnal and it doesn’t even appear in the Cambridge Hymnal – a bastion of Anglicanism.
Here’s the text of the hymn. It’s by William Blake:
And Did Those Feet In Ancient Time
And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England's mountains green?
And was the holy Lamb of God
On England's pleasant pastures seen?

And did the Countenance Divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!

I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England's green and pleasant land.

The poem is from the preface to Blake’s epic Milton a Poem, one of a collection of writings known as the Prophetic Books. It was published in 1808. The poem was inspired by a legend that the young Jesus, accompanied by his uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, traveled to the area that is now England and visited Glastonbury during the years of his life that are not accounted for in the Bible.  The legend is linked to a passage in the Book of Revelation (3:12 and 21:2) that describes the Second Coming, where Jesus establishes a “New Jerusalem.” The Christian Church in general and the English Church in particular have used Jerusalem as a metaphor for heaven. The most common interpretation of the poem is that Blake implies that Jesus would create heaven in England, in contrast to the “dark Satanic mills” of the Industrial Revolution. It is noteworthy that Blake asks four questions in the poem rather than asserting that Jesus’s visit to England actually happened. Other scholars debate this interpretation and point to the fact that Blake wrote about the realm of Satan elsewhere with no reference to the Industrial Revolution.                                                                                                      In the original, Blake inscribed below his poem an excerpt from the Book of Numbers 11:29: “Would to God that all the Lord’s people were Prophets.”                           
                                    Many literary aspects of Blake’s poem have become famous. The term “dark Satanic mills” entered the English language from this poem and is usually interpreted as a condemnation of the Industrial Revolution with its destruction of nature and the exploitation of human beings.  The line from the poem “Bring me my Chariot of fire” is taken from 2 Kings 2:11 which describes how the prophet Elijah is taken up to heaven in a chariot of fire. (The phrase inspired the title of the 1981 film, Chariots of Fire.) Blake’s phrase, “Green and pleasant Land” has become synonymous with the beauty of the English landscape and has been used as a headline ortitle for numerous books and articles about England.                                            The poem was little known until it was included in an anthology of verse in 1916, at a time when morale had begun to decline because of the numerous casualties in World War I.  At that time, the editor of the anthology, Poet Laureate Robert Bridges, asked Sir Hubert Hastings Parry to set it to music for patriotic reasons. Parry chose to set the poem as a unison song with orchestral accompaniment. It is in two stanzas, each taking up eight lines of Blake’s poem. A four-bar introduction precedes each verse and a coda (end piece) was added at the conclusion.                                                                                                                                        The piece was to be conducted by Walford Davies, Parry’s former student. Davies had arranged to have the piece published by Curwen in time for a concert at Queens Hall, March 28, 1916.  The piece was first entitled “And Did Those Feet in Ancient Time” and then changed to “Jerusalem” in 1918.                                                                      Upon hearing the orchestral version for the first time, King George V said that he preferred “Jerusalem” over “God Save the King”. It is interesting to note that England does not have an official national anthem and that many public events in that country start with “Jerusalem” rather than “God Save the Queen (King).” But why is it not in our hymnal? Some English clergy have stated that it is not technically a hymn because it is not a prayer to God. (This argument is actually very weak and has been challenged by many theologians and hymnographers.)                                        
Parry’s tune became so popular that “Jerusalem” is sung in many schools in England and private schools in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and New England. The Church of Scotland debated changing the words of the hymn to read “Albion” instead of England to make it more locally appropriate. In our own hymnal the tune appears with an alternative text by Carl P. Daw as “O day of peace that dimly shines,” #597. We tried this hymn once and it fell flat. I suspect it was because those who wanted Blake’s poem were disappointed with Daw’s text and those who had never heard “Jerusalem” at all found the hymn hard to follow. This then leads back to Renny Stackpole’s question about whether we could sing “Jerusalem” at St. John’s. There is contemporary evidence that it might become popular. Here are some reasons why:                                                                                                                      
“Jerusalem” (with Blake’s words) was sung during the wedding service of Prince William to Kate Middleton. Besides Chariots of Fire, other films in which the song is sung include Four Weddings and a Funeral, How to Get Ahead in Advertising, The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner, Calendar Girls, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Goodnight Mr. Tom, Women in Love, The Man Who Fell to Earth, and Monty Python’s Flying Circus!                                                                                                                  
Members of the congregation who attended boarding schools (especially in New England) probably know this song. For example, my spouse, Ann Greenleaf, attended Milton Academy in Milton, Massachusetts. Ann reports that it was sung before games with a rival school called Nobles. I learned it when a graduate student at Stanford University where it was sung regularly. Is it time for the preppies at St. John’s to raise their voices in song?

Resume' of Relationship by the Rev. Peter Jenks


I tend to be rather liberal when thinking about the changes that need to be made in our society, institutions or my community.  And then I find myself rather conservative when the changes are being made and they affect me, my habits and my understandings. I find it challenging, yet rewarding, to be able to share what is important to me and those things I hold sacred. And yet, I can find myself seeing others, especially on television or the street corners, who share their beliefs, as being pushy or preachy. When we promote an event, it is important that every paper and bulletin board carry our information and that everyone should come and support it. And, yet, when we pass the overwhelmed bulletin boards or crowded papers with activities we can find ourselves feeling like everyone wants a piece of us. If we make it to even a few of these events or give to even a few of them, we feel it is impressive.
            Serving and living with the Holy Spirit doesn’t mean being one way or the other, but accepting who we are and the tensions pulling on us. It is easy for me to see ministry as what we can get done, not the time spent with each other. Resumes are often filled with accomplishments, not relationships. The mistakes I have made and the failures that haunt me have made more difference and opened me up to more compassion and forgiveness than all of my seeming successes.
            When I think about what God will want of me, there can be the tendency to imagine that it will be something extraordinary, something super saint-like. If I were to really follow the call of God, then I would give up all I have, go to a far off mission field, be something different than I am now; this is the train of thought that runs from some ‘ought to’, ‘should be’, ‘guilt-of-a-life’ track in my mind. But such thinking usually causes me to do nothing, but just wallow in guilt. Repentance does not mean simply doing the opposite of what one is currently doing. The change or continuation of growth and faithfulness often leads us to muster the courage to enter into the joy that can terrify us; to garner the strength to delve into a depth of ourselves, into dark and deep places that hold rare jewels; to finally embrace the blessing which has always been before us, but because of our limited thinking we have been too blind to see.
            We are called to the mission field, the fields upon which we stand. We are called to give up everything, everything and anything that we cling to in order to shield us from ourselves and the love others have for us and we for them. We imagine what is expected of us and what we need to accomplish, while God hopes for an embrace.  As we look ahead and see impossibilities, God is looking at us wishing we would look back and be able to see each other’s eyes.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Covered Dish Supper and Movie Discussion

On Thursday, July 26th, we will have covered dish supper and a discussion on the movie, As In Heaven. This movie is about a very successful conductor coming back to a small town and the choir he joins. It is a wonderful movie of change, coming home, acceptance, and facing ourselves.

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Flower Workshop on Saturday August 18



Flower Arranging Workshop Offered at St. John’s   The Altar Guild of the Episcopal Church of St. John Baptist is pleased to offer a Flower Arranging Workshop on  Saturday, August 18.  The workshop beginning at 9:00 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. will be led by Jonnie Sue Hicks, from the Flower Guild of St. Alban’s Church and the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. 

Sermon by Andrew Eddy on July 8 2012

Encounter at Nazareth
Mark  6: 1-13
July 8, 2012

Good morning! 
Right after I signed up to preach I thought –
Andrew - what have you done?!
A few days later I received the readings for today.   I had to chuckle when I read the Gospel – Jesus returning to his home town to preach!   
There was – I’m guessing - one major difference   when Jesus got up to speak in front of all the people who had known him   he probably wasn’t quite as - nervous - as I am.
+ + +
As I read the first half of the today’s Gospel   I have to tell you  -  there is a part of me that went right to the mind, in a little fantasy,  of one of the fellows who confronted him in the Synagogue in Nazareth.  I imagined, this now bitter man, remembering Jesus when they were both kids    hearing his mother    on more than one occasion     saying–
“Andrew -  Andrew  - Andrew    why can’t you be more like Jesus ? . . . You know very well who I’m talking about.  Mary’s son?.  He’s such a good boy!”
Would I hold a grudge  - be a little jealous? 
Perhaps . . .
From what we know, Jesus was a good kid – and certainly an intelligent one.
We’re told:
As Jesus grew up he advanced in wisdom and in favor with God and men.
That’s great and good . . . but . . .  He was also one of us – human. 
For some reason I’ve never really thought of Jesus as having been one of those ‘squeeky clean’ - obnoxiously perfect  kids. 
For me – I’m thinking that he probably got himself into one fix after another as a kid – lost a mantle – ripped his tunic and got it dirty just before going to the synagogue.   And don’t we all remember what happened when he was twelve  –  the time when he and his parents went to Jerusalem for the Passover Festival . . .
Let me remind you . . . this is a good one!
When the festive season was over and they started for home, the boy Jesus  stayed behind in Jerusalem.  His parents did not know of this; but thinking that he was with the party they journeyed on for a whole day, and only then did they begin looking for him among their friends and relations.  As they could not find him they returned to Jerusalem to look for him; and after three days they found him sitting in the temple surrounded by the teachers . . . enough said.
He was  -  I’m sure -  a good kid  . . . doing what kids do!
And as a teenager - - - can you imagine what he must have been like to live with?!
Now  . . .
Imagine . . . all the mental  &  emotional  &  spiritual changes that Jesus had to have gone through as a devout young Jewish man  -  in order for him to be willing  -  and  -  able  -  to step forward into His destiny  . . .  into his divinity.
+
Why on earth would Jesus choose to go back to Nazareth – his home town – knowing that there was a pretty good chance that the reception he was going to get was going to be pretty dicey?  He must have known that his reputation was going to precede him.
Jesus wasn’t just another great ‘teacher’ on the lecture circuit –
His words   his actions   they were radical  – they were dangerous   and they were scary!    
His powerful message of repentance and the many miracles he was performing as he moved from village to village were wondrous to the throngs of people who gathered around him   and worrisome to the powers that be. 
We saw in the gospel several weeks ago how His own family out of fear or embarrassment   or both  -  “went out (to the hill-country where he was staying) to restrain him because “the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem” to check him out were saying he was possessed by the “prince of devils.”
How surprised   and perhaps upset and even shocked  -   they must have been to see their Jesus talking back to the learned scribes of Jerusalem – speaking to them with parables!
He was pushing a lot of peoples buttons   
So – why did he go back to Nazareth?
It was necessary  -  even critical that he go.
What he knew he would encounter at Nazareth would become a crash course, if you will, for his disciples on how they were to face their future as his followers  -  a future that would confront them with all the jealousy, hate and fear that the world could and would throw at them.
I can imagine –  Jesus and his disciples  -  they’ve been walking all day toward Nazareth  -   they’re hot, tired, dirty, hungry   -  and maybe even a little cranky. Turning to his disciples at the edge of town he says, “Listen up!  Pay attention!  And, yes, there will be a test!
On the Sabbath he began to teach in the synagogue, and many who heard him were astounded.  They said,
Where did this man get all this?
What is this wisdom that has been given to him?
What deeds of power are being done by his hands!
And then the fateful moment camethe crowds astonishment awakened their jealousy – their envy and their fear.
Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not his sisters here with us?
And they took offense at him.
And what are the people offended by? 
They are offended by the gifts he has, the wisdom he has and the healing power he displays. 
They are offended by his authority. 
In their minds - Jesus is no longer ‘one of them’.
+
Jesus then transforms this awkward rejection into a teaching moment for his disciples  –  and for us.
How did he react? 
He faced the derision and hatred and jealousy straight on. 
He said to the congregation  -  and to his disciples who were with him:
Prophets are not without honor, except in their hometown, and among their own kin, and in their own house.
He called the situation for what it was.  He showed his disciples what they were up against.
Teaching moment two:
Jesus and his disciples stayed in Nazareth  -  even though the lack of faith among the people meant that
he could do no deed of power there, except that he laid his hands on a few sick people and cured them.
Sadly - not even those acts of compassion among their own people could change the hearts of those who had taken offense at him.
And he was amazed at their unbelief.    
+
Jesus had shown his disciples how to face fear and find the faithful.
Then he went about among the villages teaching. 
Test time!
He called the twelve and began to send them out two by two (apostolos means ‘sent’ in Greek), and gave them authority over the unclean spirits.
Jesus was getting them used to the power and responsibility that they would hold in the future.  After carefully instructing them on the details for their first mission he sent them on their way.   They were on the ‘the radical simplicity prayer plan’ - guaranteed to foster faith and humility among them through their total reliance on God for their direction and protection.   They were available   -  and they were vulnerable.  This would be their first great undertaking of faith.
So they went out and proclaimed that all should repent.   They cast out many demons and anointed with oil many who were sick and cured them.
+
We are on our own great undertaking of faith.
We long for spiritual perfection  -  we live  - by God’s grace  -  with spiritual progress .


The Last Word

Come to the edge, he said.
They said, We are afraid.
Come to the edge, he said.
They came.
He pushed them  . . .
And they flew.

Peter McWilliams


--

D. Andrew Eddy